ComfyUI Low-VRAM Optimization: Run SDXL, FLUX, and Video Workflows on 6–8GB GPUs

"The official ComfyUI Startup Flags documentation lists lowvram, novram, reserve-vram, async offload, cache, and attention options; verify their behavior against the current documentation and main.py --help."
The terminal prints torch.cuda.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. The ComfyUI console says regular VAE encoding, retrying with tiled VAE encoding, yet the 1024×1024 image still fails. Your RTX 3060 with 8GB of VRAM can generate one SDXL image, but adding Hires Fix, FaceDetailer, and ControlNet pushes memory use past 12GB. Dropping to 768×768 and disabling ControlNet makes it run, but the result is no longer what you wanted.
On a 6–8GB consumer GPU, Apple Silicon, or AMD hardware, the real task is to make ComfyUI run SDXL, FLUX, and lightweight video workflows as reliably as possible while understanding which adjustments trade away speed, quality, or compatibility.
Start by Identifying Your GPU Tier
A VRAM budget is not guesswork. Your GPU tier determines which workflows are realistic and which strategy should come first.
Hardware tier table: VRAM, viable workflows, and a practical starting point
| VRAM tier | Viable workflows | Limits and risks | Recommended approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6GB | Lower-resolution SDXL (512–768) Heavily compressed FLUX (Q2_K/Q3_K_S + GGUF + —lowvram/—novram) Video: 8 frames at 480p as an edge case | Limited resolution Extra nodes easily trigger OOM Slow because of RAM offload | Use aggressive quantization such as Q3_K_S Keep resolution at 512–768 Disable ControlNet and post-processing branches Keep video at 8 frames or fewer |
| 8GB | Single-image SDXL at 1024×1024 FLUX fp8/GGUF Q4_K_S, without a stability guarantee Video: 8 frames at 480p comfortably, or 24 frames at 720p as an edge case | ControlNet or Hires Fix combinations can trigger OOM T5 needs fp8/GGUF Keep resolution at or below 1024×1024 FLUX.1 GGUF Q5_K_S is an edge case | Prefer FLUX.2 Klein 4B GGUF Use T5 fp8/GGUF Use tiled VAE Set batch size to 1 |
| 12GB | SDXL + ControlNet + simple upscaling FLUX Q5_K_S/Q6_K comfortably Video: 24 frames at 720p comfortably, or 60 frames at 1080p as an edge case | Multiple ControlNet branches still need care Video frames × resolution still matters Post-processing peaks remain finite | Use FLUX Q5_K_S/Q6_K T5 fp8 is optional Tiled VAE is optional Try batch size 2–3 |
| 16GB+ | FLUX full fp16 or near-lossless Q8_0 More room for ControlNet and LoRA combinations Video: 60 frames at 1080p comfortably | The full FLUX file is about 23GB Video frames × resolution still matters Post-processing still creates peaks | Use FLUX Q8_0 or fp16 T5 fp16 is practical Tiled VAE is optional Try batch size 4–8 |
Typical peak contributors, from highest to lowest:
- Model weights: an SDXL checkpoint is about 6.5GB; FLUX fp16 is about 23GB
- T5 encoder: fp16 is about 9GB and exceeds an 8GB card; fp8 is about 4–5GB; GGUF offers Q3/Q4/Q5 variants
- Latent resolution: a 2048×2048 latent can approach 8GB
- VAE encode/decode: 2048×2048 can peak around 8GB
- Batch size: concurrent inference creates the largest peak
- ControlNet/Detailer: each can add roughly 2–3GB
- Video frames: frame count × resolution × VideoVAE
- Cache and previews: roughly 0.5–1GB
Actual usage depends on resolution, precision, model version, batch size, post-processing nodes, frame count, PyTorch and driver versions, and custom node implementations. Your workflow may vary by 1–2GB. Treat the table as a starting budget, then measure the real workflow.
ComfyUI Low-VRAM Launch Flags
ComfyUI exposes several launch flags for VRAM and system-memory behavior. These flags change over time. The list below reflects ComfyUI v0.18.0+ around March 2026; always verify it with python main.py --help and the current official documentation.
Launch flags: purpose, GPU tier, performance impact, and use case
| Flag | Purpose | GPU tier | Performance impact | Use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
--lowvram | Splits model loading and streams parts from RAM | 4–8GB | 20–40% slower | Has no effect when Dynamic VRAM is enabled Use manually after disabling Dynamic VRAM with —normalvram |
--novram | Keeps weights in CPU/RAM and moves only active computation to the GPU | Below 4GB | 50–70% slower | Last resort Very slow, but may run |
--normalvram | Forces standard mode and disables Dynamic VRAM | 12GB+ | No expected impact | Use when manually testing —lowvram Or when Dynamic VRAM fragmentation causes OOM |
--reserve-vram N | Reserves N GB of VRAM for the OS | All tiers | No expected impact | Helps avoid system instability Often reserve 2–4GB |
--async-offload | Offloads weights asynchronously | All tiers | 5–10% faster | Can reduce CPU–GPU waiting when RAM is plentiful, usually 32GB+ |
--fp8_e4m3fn-unet | Forces the UNet to fp8 | 8–12GB | About neutral | Often ignored by FLUX, which may use its own compute dtype |
--fp8_e4m3fn-text-enc | Runs the text encoder in fp8 | 8GB | About neutral | Reduces T5 from about 9GB to 4–5GB Useful for low-VRAM FLUX |
--fp8_e5m2fn-text-enc | Uses another fp8 format for the text encoder | 8GB | About neutral | Alternative to fp8_e4m3fn |
--preview-method none | Disables image previews | All tiers | Slightly faster | Saves roughly 0.5–1GB A good first OOM test |
--cache-none | Disables caching | RAM-constrained systems | Slower | Saves RAM at the cost of recomputation |
--cache-lru 10 | Keeps 10 results in an LRU cache | RAM-rich systems | Faster | Balanced cache behavior Try 10–20 |
--cache-classic | Uses the older aggressive cache | RAM-rich systems | Faster | May use more RAM |
--force-fp16 | Forces global fp16 | All tiers | About neutral | Can save 2–3GB with little speed loss |
--use-pytorch-cross-attention | Forces PyTorch SDP attention | All tiers | 5–20% faster | ComfyUI often auto-selects xformers or SDP Force only for a specific test |
--use-flash-attention | Forces Flash Attention | All tiers | 5–20% faster | Requires the flash-attention package Some CUDA combinations are incompatible |
--fast | Enables experimental fast mode | All tiers | Uncertain | Advanced experiment May affect quality or stability Not a default 8GB setting |
Command examples:
# Basic 8GB VRAM configuration
python main.py --lowvram --force-fp16 --fp8_e4m3fn-text-enc --preview-method none
# Extreme 6GB VRAM configuration
python main.py --novram --force-fp16 --fp8_e4m3fn-text-enc --preview-method none --reserve-vram 2
# Performance configuration when RAM is plentiful
python main.py --async-offload --cache-lru 10 --use-pytorch-cross-attention
Volatile fact: Flags can change. Treat python main.py --help and the current official documentation as authoritative. FLUX may ignore --fp8_e4m3fn-unet because it uses an internal compute dtype; set weight_dtype in the relevant node when required.
Why Does VRAM Still Overflow After Adding —lowvram?
ComfyUI v0.18.0+ around March 2026 enables Dynamic VRAM by default to manage offloading. When Dynamic VRAM is active, --lowvram is ignored because Dynamic VRAM already applies a more adaptive low-memory policy.
When to use --lowvram manually:
- After disabling Dynamic VRAM with
--normalvram - When fragmentation causes OOM in a particular workflow, test
--disable-dynamic-vram
Alternatives:
- Rely on the default Dynamic VRAM behavior
- Use the more aggressive
--novramonly as a last resort, accepting a 50–70% slowdown - Use
--reserve-vram 2-4to leave room for the operating system
Dynamic VRAM advantage: It estimates whether VRAM is sufficient and offloads to RAM automatically.
Dynamic VRAM risk: Some workflows may still hit fragmentation-related OOM. In that case, test --disable-dynamic-vram.
Three Ways to Run FLUX on 8GB: fp8, GGUF, and Klein 4B
FLUX is a 12B-parameter model whose original file is around 23GB. On an 8GB GPU, you have three practical routes, each with a cost.
FLUX quantization routes
| Route | File size | VRAM use | Quality vs fp16 | Target GPU | Speed | Compatibility | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX full (fp16) | ~23GB | ~20GB+ | 100% | 24GB+ | Fastest | Official | Professional use Plenty of VRAM |
| FLUX fp8 checkpoint | ~12GB | ~11GB | ~95–98% | 12GB comfortably/16GB+ | Fairly fast | Official quantization | 12GB+ users One-file setup |
| FLUX GGUF Q8_0 | ~12.7GB | ~11GB | ~99% | 12GB+/16GB+ | Slower with offload | city96 node, WIP | 12GB+ users Near-lossless |
| FLUX GGUF Q5_K_S | ~8.5GB | ~7.5GB | ~94–96% | 8GB edge case/12GB comfortably | Slow with offload | city96 node, WIP | 8GB users Quality balance |
| FLUX GGUF Q4_K_S | ~6.8GB | ~6.5GB | ~88–90% | 8GB/6GB edge case | Slowest with offload | city96 node, WIP | 6–8GB edge case Prioritize running |
| FLUX.2 Klein 4B GGUF Q4_K_M | ~2.6GB | ~2.6GB | Its own 4B-model quality level | 8GB comfortably | Four steps, fast | Apache 2.0, city96 node | Recommended for 8GB Four-step inference Fast |
T5 encoder options
| T5 version | File size | VRAM use | Target GPU |
|---|---|---|---|
| T5 fp16 | ~9GB | ~9GB | 24GB+, too large for 8GB |
| T5 fp8_e4m3fn | ~4–5GB | ~4–5GB | Practical on 8GB |
| T5 GGUF Q3/Q4/Q5 | ~2–4GB | ~2–4GB | 6–8GB edge cases |
Installation
For fp8, download the fp8 safetensors file, load it with Load Diffusion Model, and set weight_dtype to fp8_e4m3fn in the node.
For GGUF, install city96’s ComfyUI-GGUF custom node, load the model with Unet Loader (GGUF), and place the file under models/unet/.
Third-party node risk: The GGUF node is marked WIP, and LoRA support is experimental. It changes frequently and is not an official built-in route.
Quality observation from Apatero: Q5_K_S is close to fp16, with differences most visible in rendered text and fine patterns. Q4_K_S loses more detail.
Performance observation from Local AI Master:
- FLUX.1-dev Q4_K_S + —lowvram, 1024×1024, 20 steps, RTX 3060 Ti 8GB: about 90–150 seconds
- FLUX.2 Klein 4B Q4_K_M, 1024×1024, four steps, 8GB VRAM: about 15–30 seconds
Volatile benchmark warning: Hardware, software versions, and workflow details can change these figures substantially. Treat them as reference ranges.
VAE Encode or Decode OOM? Use Tiled VAE
High-resolution images such as 2048×2048 and video workflows can exhaust VRAM during VAE encode or decode. Tiled VAE processes the image in smaller regions to reduce the peak.
Nodes
VAEDecodeTiled decodes a latent into an image tile by tile. VAEEncodeTiled encodes an image into a latent the same way.
Parameters
| Parameter | Purpose | Starting value | Use case |
|---|---|---|---|
tile_size | Size of each spatial tile | 512 for low VRAM 1024 when comfortable | Smaller tiles use less VRAM but run more slowly 512 is a practical 8GB starting point |
overlap | Overlap between tiles | 64 | Helps prevent tile seams Try 32–128 |
fast mode | Faster processing mode | true | Usually worth enabling |
temporal_size | Temporal chunk size for video VAE only | 8 for low VRAM 16 when comfortable | Processes video frames in groups Only meaningful for video VAE |
temporal_overlap | Overlap between temporal chunks | 2–4 | Maintains continuity between frame groups |
Peak comparison from SynpixCloud
| Resolution | Standard VAE peak | Tiled at 512 | Tiled at 1024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1024×1024 | ~2GB | ~0.5GB | ~1GB |
| 2048×2048 | ~8GB | ~1GB | ~2.5GB |
Use tiled VAE when:
- Resolution exceeds 1024×1024
- The GPU has 8–12GB
- The workflow uses a video VAE
- Hires Fix, Upscale, or FaceDetailer fails during post-processing
Documentation caveat: The node documentation is marked as AI-generated. Verify the current UI and parameters in your installed ComfyUI version.
OOM Troubleshooting by Peak Source
When CUDA out of memory appears, diagnose peak sources from largest to smallest and attach one concrete downgrade to each.
OOM troubleshooting table
| Peak source | Example VRAM use | Downgrade action | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model weights | SDXL ~6.5GB FLUX fp16 ~23GB | Switch to fp8/GGUF Use —lowvram/—novram | P0 |
| T5 encoder | fp16 ~9GB | Use T5 fp8/GGUF through a compatible loader | P0 for FLUX |
| Latent resolution | 2048×2048 ~8GB | Reduce to 1024×1024 or 512×512 | P1 |
| VAE encode/decode | 2048×2048 can peak near 8GB | Use tiled VAE with tile_size=512 and overlap=64 | P1 |
| Batch size | batch size=4 at 1024×1024 can peak around 8–12GB | Set batch size=1 Use a queued batch count | P2 |
| ControlNet/Detailer | Each can add ~2–3GB | Disable the ControlNet branch Or use a lower-memory ControlNet route | P2 |
| Video frames | Frames × resolution × VideoVAE | Use temporal chunking Reduce frames Use temporal tiled VAE | P2 for video |
| Cache/previews | ~0.5–1GB | Use —preview-method none Use —cache-none | P3 |
Apply changes in this order:
- Lower resolution: 2048 → 1024 → 512
- Disable previews:
--preview-method none - Switch to an fp8/GGUF model: use FLUX Q4_K_S, Q5_K_S, or Klein 4B
- Switch T5 to fp8/GGUF: essential for low-VRAM FLUX
- Use tiled VAE: start with tile_size=512 and overlap=64
- Lower batch size: set batch size=1 and use a queued batch count
- Disable ControlNet and post-processing branches: FaceDetailer, Hires Fix, and Upscale
- For video: reduce frames and use temporal chunking
Troubleshoot Slow Generation by Separating Two Kinds of Slow
First decide whether the workflow is slow because low-VRAM offloading makes it slow, or whether a tunable setting is making it slower than necessary.
Speed troubleshooting table
| Bottleneck | Symptom | Diagnostic | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expected low-VRAM slowdown | |||
| —lowvram/—novram | 20–70% slower | Check launch flags | Accept the slowdown Or use a GPU with more VRAM |
| GGUF offload to RAM | Low GPU utilization | Check GPU utilization in the system monitor | RAM bandwidth controls speed Use fp8/fp16 when VRAM permits |
| Video workflow with many frames | Slow VAE decode | Calculate frames × resolution | Reduce frames Use temporal tiling |
| CPU mode with —cpu | Extremely slow | Check launch flags | Use only as a last resort Switch to a GPU |
| Unexpected slowdown | |||
| Too many sampler steps | FLUX dev uses more than 20 steps | Inspect KSampler | About 20 steps may be enough for FLUX dev schnell/Klein 4B may need only four |
| Attention backend not tuned | High memory use | Inspect launch options | Install xformers when compatible Or test PyTorch SDP attention |
| Slow VAE decode | Tiled VAE tile_size is too small | Inspect VAEDecodeTiled | Increase tile_size from 512 to 1024 About 1GB more peak VRAM, potentially 10–30% faster |
| CPU offload stalls | CPU–GPU waiting | Inspect launch options | Enable —async-offload Make sure RAM is sufficient, usually 32GB+ |
| Poor disk or memory caching | Models reload repeatedly | Inspect launch options | Try —cache-lru 10 Cache 10 results |
| Another process occupies the GPU | Low useful GPU utilization | Check the system monitor | Close browsers, games, or video editors |
Try these adjustments in order:
- Enable xformers or SDP attention:
pip install xformersfor auto-detection, or test--use-pytorch-cross-attention; reference ranges suggest 20–30% lower VRAM and 5–20% higher speed - Use a four-step FLUX model: schnell or Klein 4B instead of dev at 20 steps
- Increase tiled VAE tile_size: 512 → 1024, accepting roughly 1GB more peak VRAM for a possible 10–30% speedup
- Enable async offload:
--async-offloadwhen RAM is plentiful - Close other GPU-heavy processes: browsers, games, and video editors
SynpixCloud observation: xformers or SDP attention used 20–30% less VRAM and ran 5–20% faster in the cited environment.
Local AI Master observation: FLUX.2 Klein 4B Q4_K_M at four steps and 1024×1024 took about 15–30 seconds on an 8GB GPU.
Volatile benchmark warning: Treat all timing and memory ranges as environment-specific references.
Why Can a Smaller GGUF File Be Slower?
A smaller GGUF file, such as Q4_K_S at about 6.8GB instead of FLUX fp16 at about 23GB, can still generate more slowly:
- GGUF may offload model weights to system RAM instead of keeping them in VRAM, lowering GPU utilization
- Inference repeatedly moves weights from RAM to VRAM
- RAM bandwidth is much lower than VRAM bandwidth: DDR4/DDR5 is roughly 25–50GB/s, while GDDR6X can reach roughly 500–1000GB/s
Use GGUF when:
- A 6–8GB GPU cannot fit the fp8 route and GGUF is the remaining way to run FLUX
- You accept slower generation in exchange for fitting the model
Avoid GGUF when:
- A 12GB+ GPU can use fp8 or fp16 more efficiently
- Speed matters more than fitting the model at any cost
Apatero observation: Q8_0 with CPU offloading may take 5–10 minutes per generation.
Video VRAM Budget: Frames × Resolution × VideoVAE
In a video workflow, frames × resolution × VideoVAE can quickly dominate VRAM. This section covers budgeting and peak reduction, not a complete Wan or AnimateDiff workflow.
Budget principle
Peak VRAM is roughly model weights + T5 + frame count × per-frame latent + the VideoVAE peak.
Example budget based on the cited ComfyUI-Wan2.2 workflow and Local AI Master material
| Video setting | VRAM budget | Target GPU | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 frames at 480p (640×360) | ~6–8GB | 6GB may work | A cited RTX 3050 6GB run generated roughly one second of video within five minutes |
| 24 frames at 720p (1280×720) | ~12–16GB | 8GB edge case/12GB comfortable | Requires temporal tiling |
| 60 frames at 1080p (1920×1080) | ~20–24GB+ | 16GB+ | High-VRAM route |
Ways to reduce the peak
Temporal tiling splits video frames into smaller groups, such as eight frames at a time. The relevant controls are temporal_size and temporal_overlap.
Tiled VAE processes each frame’s VAE decode in spatial regions.
Reduce frame count from 60 to 24 to 8, and verify the smallest run first.
Reduce resolution from 1080p to 720p to 480p.
For model choice, the source workflow suggests Wan 2.2 5B for an 8GB target or Wan 2.2 14B GGUF from 6GB.
Volatile benchmark warning: Treat the numbers as environment-specific reference ranges.
Avoid OOM in Batch Generation: Batch Size vs Batch Count
Batch size and batch count create very different VRAM peaks. Raising batch size blindly is a common way to trigger OOM.
Batch size vs batch count
Batch size runs multiple images concurrently, so latent, VAE, and other active tensors scale with the number of images. Batch count queues several batches sequentially, keeping each active batch small.
VRAM comparison
| Configuration | Resolution | Peak VRAM | OOM risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| batch size=4 | 1024×1024 | ~8–12GB | High because the peak is concurrent |
| batch count=4, batch size=1 | 1024×1024 | ~2–3GB | Lower because each image runs sequentially |
Recommendation:
- On 6–8GB GPUs, use batch size=1 and batch count=N
- For API batches, use the queue and concurrency controls from the ComfyUI API automation workflow instead of starting several VRAM-heavy requests at once
Sudden OOM After an Update? Check Version Changes
If a workflow becomes slower or starts failing after a PyTorch, driver, or ComfyUI update, the environment may have changed even though the prompt and graph did not.
Version changes that affect VRAM
PyTorch CUDA behavior changes across versions, including TF32/FP16 defaults and allocator behavior. TF32 and FP16 are not universally better: PyTorch examples show that TF32 matrix multiplication can be faster with higher numerical error. Driver, ROCm, and CUDA versions also change GPU behavior.
Recommended process:
- Back up the environment before updating with conda or
pip freeze - Test the new version in a separate environment
- Record the stable PyTorch, CUDA, and driver versions
- Roll back to a pinned version when a regression appears
Experimental Speedups vs Stable Starting Points
Separate experimental acceleration options from the settings that make sense as a stable first test.
Advanced experiments, not default requirements for an 8GB GPU
| Item | Status | Risk | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
--fast | Experimental | May affect quality or stability | Marked experimental by ComfyUI |
| FlashAttention | Requires the flash-attention package | Some CUDA versions are incompatible | Installation can be involved |
| Sage Attention | Third-party optimization | Experimental and may affect precision | Requires a matching CUDA/PyTorch environment |
| TensorRT | Requires TensorRT SDK and extra setup | Model conversion is complex | Poor fit for beginners |
Stable starting points
| Item | Status | Effect | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| xformers | Stable when compatible | Reference range: 20–30% less VRAM and 5–20% faster | pip install xformersComfyUI auto-detects it |
| SDP attention with —use-pytorch-cross-attention | Stable | Reference range: 20–30% less VRAM and 5–20% faster | ComfyUI may already choose the best backend automatically |
Conclusion
Hardware tier: Start by identifying whether the GPU has 6GB, 8GB, 12GB, or 16GB+ because each tier supports a different baseline workflow.
Core flags: Dynamic VRAM is enabled by default in the cited v0.18.0+ behavior, so --lowvram may do nothing. Flags change; verify them with python main.py --help.
Quantization route: The source measurements favor FLUX.2 Klein 4B GGUF for an 8GB fast route, or FLUX.1 GGUF Q4_K_S when fitting the model matters more than speed. GGUF offloading depends heavily on RAM bandwidth.
Troubleshooting order: Diagnose OOM by model weights → T5 → latent resolution → VAE → batch size → ControlNet → video frames → cache. For speed, distinguish expected offload slowdown from a genuinely tunable bottleneck.
Next steps:
- Identify the GPU tier: 6GB, 8GB, 12GB, or 16GB+
- Select a quantization route, such as FLUX.2 Klein 4B or FLUX.1 GGUF Q4_K_S for the cited 8GB cases
- Use the OOM checklist when memory fails
- Use the speed checklist when generation is unexpectedly slow
- Use temporal tiling for video workflows
If the base environment is not running yet, start with the ComfyUI beginner guide. For red nodes, missing models, or failed workflow reproduction, use the ComfyUI workflow reuse troubleshooting checklist. If you have not decided between SDXL, SD 3.5, and FLUX, read the Stable Diffusion model selection guide.
Troubleshoot ComfyUI Low-VRAM OOM Errors
Start with inexpensive resolution and batch changes, then inspect model precision, T5, VAE, extra nodes, and environment versions without changing several variables at once.
- 1
Step 1: Record where the OOM occurs
Identify whether the error happens while loading the model, sampling, running VAE Encode/Decode, processing video, or after an update. Save the console error and current versions. - 2
Step 2: Lower resolution and batch size
Set batch size to 1 and lower the resolution in stages. Put batch jobs in a sequential queue instead of letting several heavy workflows occupy VRAM at once. - 3
Step 3: Disable previews and extra branches
Use --preview-method none and temporarily disable ControlNet, FaceDetailer, Hires Fix, Upscale, and other second-pass sampling branches. - 4
Step 4: Change model and T5 precision
For FLUX, test an official fp8 route or a supported GGUF route, and replace T5 fp16 with fp8 or a compatible T5 GGUF. - 5
Step 5: Reduce the VAE peak
If the OOM appears after sampling, use VAEEncodeTiled or VAEDecodeTiled and begin with smaller tiles and fewer video frames. - 6
Step 6: Verify VRAM launch flags
Check --lowvram, --novram, --reserve-vram, async offload, and cache flags against the current python main.py --help output instead of copying an outdated combination. - 7
Step 7: Restore one variable at a time
With the same seed and workflow, restore resolution, nodes, steps, or the attention backend one by one while recording VRAM, speed, and output differences. - 8
Step 8: Check for a version regression
If the issue started after an update, compare ComfyUI, custom node, PyTorch, CUDA/ROCm, and driver versions, and roll back to a known stable environment when necessary.
FAQ
Can a 6GB GPU run SDXL in ComfyUI?
Can an 8GB GPU run FLUX?
Why does ComfyUI ignore --lowvram?
Is FLUX fp8 or GGUF better for low VRAM?
How do I fix an OOM error during VAE Decode?
What should I change first when ComfyUI is too slow?
16 min read · Published on: Jul 21, 2026 · Modified on: Jul 21, 2026
ComfyUI & Stable Diffusion: Setup, Models, and Workflows
If you landed here from search, the fastest way to build context is to jump to the previous or next post in this same series.
Previous
ComfyUI Upscaling and Inpainting: Hires Fix, FaceDetailer, and Local Repairs
Choose between pixel upscaling, latent resampling, FaceDetailer, manual inpainting, and tiled upscaling, then troubleshoot face drift, seams, and mask spill.
Part 7 of 8
Next
This is the latest post in the series so far.



Comments
Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment